Re: TSC instead of ACPI: powerd doesn't work anymore (to be expected?)
From: David Xu (davidxu_at_freebsd.org)
Date: 10/31/05
- Previous message: Robert Watson: "Re: TSC instead of ACPI: powerd doesn't work anymore (to be expected?)"
- In reply to: Robert Watson: "Re: TSC instead of ACPI: powerd doesn't work anymore (to be expected?)"
- Next in thread: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: TSC instead of ACPI: powerd doesn't work anymore (to be expected?)"
- Reply: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: TSC instead of ACPI: powerd doesn't work anymore (to be expected?)"
- Reply: Robert Watson: "Re: TSC instead of ACPI: powerd doesn't work anymore (to be expected?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 18:18:35 +0800 To: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
Robert Watson wrote:
>
>
> It has been suggested that the former can operate quite well with
> significantly reduced quality. It has alos been suggested that most
> applications could operate fine with somewhat reduced quality, but that
> the API definitions don't say anything about how to specify application
> quality requirements vs performance requirements for time measurement.
Can we change gettimeofday and clock_gettime to lower resolution now?
I think 1000hz/s is enough for most applications, since a thread can
never sleep shorter than a tick for years. We can introduce
hrtime_t clock_gethrtime(clockid_t clock) to get hi-resolution time
as the one seen in RTLinux, or gethrtime() as seen in Solaris (Daniel
Eischen said?)
David Xu
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Robert Watson: "Re: TSC instead of ACPI: powerd doesn't work anymore (to be expected?)"
- In reply to: Robert Watson: "Re: TSC instead of ACPI: powerd doesn't work anymore (to be expected?)"
- Next in thread: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: TSC instead of ACPI: powerd doesn't work anymore (to be expected?)"
- Reply: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: TSC instead of ACPI: powerd doesn't work anymore (to be expected?)"
- Reply: Robert Watson: "Re: TSC instead of ACPI: powerd doesn't work anymore (to be expected?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]