Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- From: Mike Jakubik <mikej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 04:03:14 -0500
Brian Candler wrote:
I guess this is OK, *if* you trust the power management system to do its job
properly. Unfortunately I have very bad experiences of such things. In many
cases I've ended up turning off power management completely and locking
everything at max clock speed. Mind you, if I do that, anything you do with
scaling factors isn't going to affect me, so actually I don't really care.
I'll shut up now :-)
Let's not forget, FreeBSD is really a server OS. Who in their right mind uses power saving features on a server? It sounds nice in theory, but doesn't work as well.
_______________________________________________ freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- From: John Baldwin
- Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- From: Garance A Drosihn
- Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- From: Kevin Oberman
- Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- References:
- Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- From: Peter Jeremy
- Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- From: Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- From: Brian Candler
- Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- From: John-Mark Gurney
- Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- From: Brian Candler
- Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- Prev by Date: Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- Next by Date: Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- Previous by thread: Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- Next by thread: Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|