I also think that it would be a good idea to do it (at least, it would
be easier to understand, because IFF_PPROMISC is not that explicit). If
nobody has already done it, I'll work on this.
There is another point on which I would appreciate to know your opinion:
referring to if.c[1269], I understand that if IFF_PPROMISC is set in
ifp->if_flags, IFF_PROMISC should be set to (or we are in a transient
situation).
It appears that if_ethersubr.c[652] is working in this case. Isn't it a
mistake ?
Thanks a lot !
--
Gregory
(Forwarded here, because I got no answers on freebsd-net@)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
RE: RH rips again Was: extend EOL for Red Hat Linux 9? ... On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 15:40, Mike Bartman wrote: ... > system...a continuous beta release. ... I've always felt that referring to the test releases as "unstable" was a ...mistake.... (Fedora)
Re: more power to their elbow ... >>> I think his mistake is forgiveable, if only for the laugh it gave me. ... but it could be argued that simply referring to a black ... >>IMO, people are far to keen to throw the race card into the equation. ... (uk.rec.driving)
Re: A note on personal corruption as a result of using C ...Ben Bacarisse writes: ... say which message it is you are referring to, ... Either admit you made a mistake, post the link, or say that ... you are lying. ... (comp.programming)
Kmail keeps sending to the wrong address ... I'm a newbie.... I accidently typed a mistake into an address panel and every time I ... type it correctly it won't send because it is referring to the wrong ... (alt.os.linux.suse)
