Re: [RFC] what do we do with picobsd ?
- From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:22:58 +0000
In message <20060131.131654.134137067.imp@xxxxxxxxxx>, "M. Warner Losh" writes:
>In message: <43DFC2D5.7040706@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sam Leffler <sam@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>Since I've started working on the bring up on an ARM based board, I've
>been wanting something that is easy to work with and that worked. I
>think it would help us a lot in the embedded space if we had something
>integrated into the base OS to do this stuff.
I agree. I think we need to be much more inclusive in our concept of
a 'release' than we are now.
As I see it, PicoBSD with its "additive" approach would cover the
low-capacity (<32 MB ?) range, NanoBSD with its "subtractive" approach
takes over from there, FreeSBIE covers the "don't touch my disk"
range and finally the full blown release as we know it.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@xxxxxxxxxxx | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] what do we do with picobsd ?
- From: M. Warner Losh
- Re: [RFC] what do we do with picobsd ?
- From: Julian Elischer
- Re: [RFC] what do we do with picobsd ?
- References:
- Re: [RFC] what do we do with picobsd ?
- From: M. Warner Losh
- Re: [RFC] what do we do with picobsd ?
- Prev by Date: panic: Memory modified after free
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] what do we do with picobsd ?
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] what do we do with picobsd ?
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] what do we do with picobsd ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|