Re: Portsnap support on CURRENT
- From: Martin Wilke <unixfreunde@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 11:24:45 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:40:49 -0800
Freddie Cash <fcash@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Friday 10 February 2006 01:43 pm, Paul Mather wrote:
I've noticed lately a lot of "succeeds port" messages when I run
portversion (from the portupgrade port) to list which of my packages
are out of date and require updating. These messages are incorrect
(i.e., the "port has" version identified by portversion is older
than that in the actual port Makefile), and I don't get incorrect
identifications from either pkg_version or portmanager. (I also
don't get this problem on a RELENG_6 system I have, either.)
After a little looking, I discovered that my /usr/ports/INDEX-7
file is not being updated. Investigation of the portsnap source
reveals that it only actually generates INDEX, INDEX-5, and INDEX-6
from portsnap updates in extract_indices(); it doesn't generate
INDEX-7.
Workarounds until portsnap does it again, in order of length of time
to generate INDEX-7:
cd /usr/ports ; make fetchindex
cd usr/ports ; make index
pkgdb -U
Hi
i have in my make.conf INDEXFILE=INDEX-6 this works.
Greets Martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFD7btvFRZ/kBT4vp8RAvStAKCKzZGNtaUgsg/Nmlq/Vb/MGBUQ+gCgjN1G
x6Z+GVckrngVVEAljnT1BxE=
=P7Pg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Portsnap support on CURRENT
- From: Paul Mather
- Re: Portsnap support on CURRENT
- From: Freddie Cash
- Portsnap support on CURRENT
- Prev by Date: Re: acpica memory leak?
- Next by Date: GELI improvements.
- Previous by thread: Re: Portsnap support on CURRENT
- Next by thread: -current is sluggish
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|