Re: RFC: separate 3dfx_linux module
- From: Scott Long <scottl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 09:17:24 -0700
Yar Tikhiy wrote:
Hi there,
In the course of reviewing and cleaning up the default configuration
of kernel options, it was suggested by the Release Engineers that
we had a separate module for TDFX_LINUX instead of placing the
burden on the device tdfx and module 3dfx. Could anybody interested
test this change? I've made sure it builds, but I have no 3dfx hw
to really test it. The testing is as simple as building the new
3dfx and 3dfx_linux modules, loading them, and verifying that the
linux apps work with the device as before. Thanks in advance!
Why keep the TDFX_LINUX option defined in sys/conf/options?
Scott
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: separate 3dfx_linux module
- From: Coleman Kane
- Re: RFC: separate 3dfx_linux module
- References:
- RFC: separate 3dfx_linux module
- From: Yar Tikhiy
- RFC: separate 3dfx_linux module
- Prev by Date: ATA DMA dump failures: take 2
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] kbdmux(4) update
- Previous by thread: RFC: separate 3dfx_linux module
- Next by thread: Re: RFC: separate 3dfx_linux module
- Index(es):