Re: RFC: separate 3dfx_linux module
- From: Coleman Kane <cokane@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:57:40 -0500
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 03:13:05PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 03:11:02PM -0500, Coleman Kane wrote:
Sounds good to me. In the event that you want to build this statically
into the kernel, doesn't the option still need to be available,
or are we talking about a device tdfxlinux ?
It was exactly my point, too: the TDFX_LINUX option has to be there
so that people still can compile device tdfx with Linux support into
the main kernel file.
Not to mention so that they can omit said functionality if it is not
desired. I believe that the kmod by default compiles this in though.
_______________________________________________
--
Yar
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: separate 3dfx_linux module
- From: Scott Long
- Re: RFC: separate 3dfx_linux module
- References:
- RFC: separate 3dfx_linux module
- From: Yar Tikhiy
- Re: RFC: separate 3dfx_linux module
- From: Scott Long
- Re: RFC: separate 3dfx_linux module
- From: Coleman Kane
- Re: RFC: separate 3dfx_linux module
- From: Yar Tikhiy
- RFC: separate 3dfx_linux module
- Prev by Date: Re: RFC: separate 3dfx_linux module
- Next by Date: Re: RFC: separate 3dfx_linux module
- Previous by thread: Re: RFC: separate 3dfx_linux module
- Next by thread: Re: RFC: separate 3dfx_linux module
- Index(es):