Re: FreeBSD-SA-06:14.fpu
- From: Marius Nuennerich <marius.nuennerich@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 11:50:30 +0200
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 16:59:49 +0800
David Xu <davidxu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Igor Sysoev wrote:
The last security advisory FreeBSD-SA-06:14.fpu
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-06:14.fpu.asc
that fixes very doubtful security bug in AMD CPUs, also
adds unnecessary penalty in FPU context switch for all other
SSE-enabled CPUs.
Igor Sysoev
http://sysoev.ru/en/
Probably it should only be applied to AMD CPU but not Intel and others,
it is easy to check cpu vendor and put a
if (bug_fxsave)
fpu_clean_state();
in file npx.c.
David Xu
Shouldn't we use an existing variable which is already in L1 instead of
the new dummy_variable? Or isn't this noticable in performance?
btw Linux does it this way:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.16.y.git;a=commitdiff;h=7466f9e72dac13452d871a3fb72fc7bd9c93c864
regards
Marius
P.S. I have no idea what variable we could use.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- FreeBSD-SA-06:14.fpu
- From: Igor Sysoev
- Re: FreeBSD-SA-06:14.fpu
- From: David Xu
- FreeBSD-SA-06:14.fpu
- Prev by Date: Re: FreeBSD-SA-06:14.fpu
- Next by Date: lpt0 disappear (ppc related)
- Previous by thread: Re: FreeBSD-SA-06:14.fpu
- Next by thread: Re: FreeBSD-SA-06:14.fpu
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|