Re: [RFC] Removal of Fortran from the base system
- From: Anish Mistry <mistry.7@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 00:51:55 -0400
On Friday 26 May 2006 23:26, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
On May 26, 2006, at 8:14 PM, Mike Jakubik wrote:I don't personally use Fortran, but I know a lot of engineers that do.
Agreed, who the hell still uses Fortran?
I have great gobs of RF design and analysis code that is written in
F77 (and 66 for that matter). In the RF engineering field the
Fortran versions of Spice and friends are still quite popular. And
I know more than a handful of physicists who will never write a
line of C code, and nor should they, since their existing Fortran
tools are perfectly viable. A lot of these people rely on the
system shipping a Fortran compiler -- they're scientists, not
sysadmins. And believe me ... there IS a difference! (Now the
physics guys would be tickled pink if the system compiler was
upgraded to F95 or better ;-)
Though they use a much more recent version than Fortran 77. I'd vote
for removing it if it will make the import easier, but one or more
Fortran compilers in the ports would need to be on the disc1 install
ISO.
--
Anish Mistry
Attachment:
pgpa7IMniDIpT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- [RFC] Removal of Fortran from the base system
- From: Steve Kargl
- Re: [RFC] Removal of Fortran from the base system
- From: Mike Jakubik
- Re: [RFC] Removal of Fortran from the base system
- From: Lyndon Nerenberg
- [RFC] Removal of Fortran from the base system
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] Removal of Fortran from the base system
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] Removal of Fortran from the base system
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] Removal of Fortran from the base system
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] Removal of Fortran from the base system
- Index(es):