Re: [PATCH] Fixup locking for kernel-linker, needs ndis testing(!)
- From: "Christian S.J. Peron" <csjp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 10:12:08 -0500
Currently, we are using Giant to serialize access into the sysctl tree. This means that if the kernel linker is not picking up Giant, there could be a race between when the kernel modules load/unload sysctls, and somebody reading the sysctl tree.
I am not sure what the best thing to do here is yet. I've looked at the locking for sysctl tree, and locking these entry points can be sticky due to the recursive nature of the code.
John Baldwin wrote:
I've reworked the locking for the kernel linker to convert the existing kld_mtx to an sx lock and extend it's scope to cover all of the various linker-related data structures. I also changed the kernel linker API a bit to make it more amenable to locking in that I added a 'linker_file_foreach' that iterates over the list of linker files calling a supplied predicate function and made the functions to lookup a linker file by name or index private. This meant that the ndis and hwpmc code had to stop fondling the kernel linker internals. I also made the VFS Giant locking in ndis and the kernel linker conditional such that it only locks Giant for non-MPSAFE filesystems.--
I have runtested this patch a while back, but the ndis and hwpmc parts have only been compile tested. Please test.
http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/kld.patch
Christian S.J. Peron
csjp@xxxxxxxxxxx
FreeBSD Committer
FreeBSD Security Team
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Fixup locking for kernel-linker, needs ndis testing(!)
- From: John Baldwin
- Re: [PATCH] Fixup locking for kernel-linker, needs ndis testing(!)
- References:
- [PATCH] Fixup locking for kernel-linker, needs ndis testing(!)
- From: John Baldwin
- [PATCH] Fixup locking for kernel-linker, needs ndis testing(!)
- Prev by Date: Re: Atheros 5212 in 6.1-REL
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] Removal of Fortran from the base system
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] Fixup locking for kernel-linker, needs ndis testing(!)
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Fixup locking for kernel-linker, needs ndis testing(!)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|