Re: HEADS-UP: removed COMPAT_43 from GENERIC (and other configs)

On Thursday 15 June 2006 12:36, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <4491C2F0.6000007@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mike Jakubik writes:
What about COMPAT_43TTY? Is this still needed, how exactly does it
affect the system?

It adds a bunch of ancient-compatible ioctls to the kernel.

It is, as a principle, not needed, but thanks to the many variants
of "sh configure" employed in usr/ports, a quite large number of
ports go "Ohh, this is BSD, I'd better use the old ioctls" and
break if you don't offer them.

Is there a way to easily identify these ports? I've had both lines commented
out of my kernel configs for some time and haven't seen any port breakage on
either 6.x or -current.

Beech

--

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
/"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310
X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501
/ \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------












--

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - beech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
/"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310
X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501
/ \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------











Attachment: pgpLbRTw4MEKj.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Relevant Pages