Re: carp kernel trap
- From: Yar Tikhiy <yar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:08:53 +0400
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 04:46:51PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 04:34:09PM +0400, Denis Shaposhnikov wrote:
D> >>>>> "Max" == Max Laier <max@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
D>
D> Max> Please try the attached patch and let me know if that fixes
D> Max> things for you.
D>
D> Thank you! It seems that it fixes the panic. I've successfully done
D>
D> # ifconfig fxp0 inet 10.10.14.8/24
D> # ifconfig carp0 create
D> # ifconfig carp0 vhid 1 pass 12345678 10.10.14.4/24
D>
D> It reports that fxp0 is in promiscuous mode. I don't know is it OK?
This is OK for carp.
...but a possible to-do item is to program the reception filter in
smart NICs so that they receive frames destined to the CARP unicast
address(es) without having to go completely promiscuous.
--
Yar
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- carp kernel trap
- From: Denis Shaposhnikov
- Re: carp kernel trap
- From: Yar Tikhiy
- Re: carp kernel trap
- From: Maxim Konovalov
- Re: carp kernel trap
- From: Max Laier
- Re: carp kernel trap
- From: Denis Shaposhnikov
- Re: carp kernel trap
- From: Gleb Smirnoff
- carp kernel trap
- Prev by Date: Re: carp kernel trap
- Next by Date: broken stack trace (Was: carp kernel trap)
- Previous by thread: Re: carp kernel trap
- Next by thread: broken stack trace (Was: carp kernel trap)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
