Re: HEADS UP: GCC 3.4.6 update in progress
- From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" <conrads@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 20:29:16 -0500
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:04:47 -0700, Steve Kargl
<sgk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 05:50:22PM -0500, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
Incidentally, I've been wondering for the longest time now: is/are
there any particular reason(s) why we exclude gcj from the gcc
tree/build? Sure would be a cool thing to have.
1) It's not needed to build anything in the base system.
2) It takes a long time to build.
3) You really want to use the gcc41 or gcc42 port.
Of course, IMHO.
I've tried both ports, but gcj fails to run, complaining about a
missing "spec" file (I forget the exact filename, maybe
"gcjlib.spec" or something similar). :-(
Is this maybe an arch-specific (amd64) problem? Or?
--
Conrad J. Sabatier <conrads@xxxxxxx> -- "In Unix veritas"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: HEADS UP: GCC 3.4.6 update in progress
- From: Steve Kargl
- Re: HEADS UP: GCC 3.4.6 update in progress
- References:
- HEADS UP: GCC 3.4.6 update in progress
- From: Alexander Kabaev
- Re: HEADS UP: GCC 3.4.6 update in progress
- From: Conrad J. Sabatier
- Re: HEADS UP: GCC 3.4.6 update in progress
- From: Steve Kargl
- HEADS UP: GCC 3.4.6 update in progress
- Prev by Date: Re: [HEADS UP]: OpenLDAP+nss_ldap+nss_modules separated patch and more (SoC)
- Next by Date: Re: HEADS UP: GCC 3.4.6 update in progress
- Previous by thread: Re: HEADS UP: GCC 3.4.6 update in progress
- Next by thread: Re: HEADS UP: GCC 3.4.6 update in progress
- Index(es):