Re: isofs/cd9660 -> relocate to fs/isofs/cd9660?
- From: Scott Long <scottl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:43:43 -0600
Eric Anderson wrote:
I noticed that cd9660 file system is in sys/isofs/cd9660 instead of what seems more logical: sys/fs/cd9660. Is there any reason not to move it? Curious mostly..
Eric
Inertia, mostly. And if you move cd9660, do you also move ufs? Let the
bi-yearly debate begin.....
Btw, this is a topic that is easily searched on, as it gets brought up
fairly regularly. We were a bit late on the schedule this time, though,
so thanks for giving it a kickstart.
Scott
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: isofs/cd9660 -> relocate to fs/isofs/cd9660?
- From: John Baldwin
- Re: isofs/cd9660 -> relocate to fs/isofs/cd9660?
- From: Eric Anderson
- Re: isofs/cd9660 -> relocate to fs/isofs/cd9660?
- References:
- isofs/cd9660 -> relocate to fs/isofs/cd9660?
- From: Eric Anderson
- isofs/cd9660 -> relocate to fs/isofs/cd9660?
- Prev by Date: isofs/cd9660 -> relocate to fs/isofs/cd9660?
- Next by Date: Re: isofs/cd9660 -> relocate to fs/isofs/cd9660?
- Previous by thread: isofs/cd9660 -> relocate to fs/isofs/cd9660?
- Next by thread: Re: isofs/cd9660 -> relocate to fs/isofs/cd9660?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|