Re: isofs/cd9660 -> relocate to fs/isofs/cd9660?

Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting John Baldwin <jhb@xxxxxxxxxxx> (from Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:27:29 -0400):

We've actually moved most of the filesystems into sys/fs in the past. Only
cd9660, nfs, and ufs are in the top-level. I'd still say leave nfs and ufs
alone, but sys/isofs/cd9660 -> sys/fs/cd9660 (I wouldn't keep the extra isofs
directory) probably wouldn't be but so painful at this point.


I expect a lot of moves when we switch to a VCS where moves are cheap... but on the other hand, maybe this is another bikeshed.

Bye,
Alexander.


Moves in CVS are relatively easy too, it's just that they can only
be performed by a special group of people, and that special group
rarely responds to requests. So, it's a policy problem, not a
technology problem. I would imagine than any new VCS that the project
adopts would have similar policies in place, and moves will still be
impossible.

Scott

_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"

Relevant Pages