Re: KSE, libpthread & libthr: almost newbie question
- From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:56:21 +0200
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello ,
I've was sure, that both libpthread and libthr use KSE to make multithreading. They use KSE in different ways: libpthread uses N:M model and libthr uses 1:1 model, but bot use KSE to work.
How will be possible to use these libraries (read: multithreaded programs) when KSE will be optional, on kernel without KSE?!
Yes, isn't KSE by definition "that thing that is scheduled in the kernel"?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: KSE, libpthread & libthr: almost newbie question
- From: Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: KSE, libpthread & libthr: almost newbie question
- References:
- KSE, libpthread & libthr: almost newbie question
- From: Lev Serebryakov
- KSE, libpthread & libthr: almost newbie question
- Prev by Date: Re: HEADSUP: KSE about to become a kernel option
- Next by Date: Re: KSE, libpthread & libthr: almost newbie question
- Previous by thread: KSE, libpthread & libthr: almost newbie question
- Next by thread: Re: KSE, libpthread & libthr: almost newbie question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
