Re: KSE, libpthread & libthr: almost newbie question
- From: "Nuno Antunes" <nuno.antunes@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:43:21 +0100
On 10/27/06, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
KSE == N:M threading
A 1:1 threading (libthr) is much simpler than N:M threading (libpthread),
and thus doesn't require KSE support in the kernel; see kse(2) manpage
for details. Without the KSE option in the kernel, all kse(2) syscalls
will return EOPNOTSUPP, and a lot of code becomes redundant.
IIRC, I can even remember libpthread being originaly named libkse.
Regards,
Nuno
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: KSE, libpthread & libthr: almost newbie question
- From: Ruslan Ermilov
- Re: KSE, libpthread & libthr: almost newbie question
- References:
- KSE, libpthread & libthr: almost newbie question
- From: Lev Serebryakov
- Re: KSE, libpthread & libthr: almost newbie question
- From: Ivan Voras
- Re: KSE, libpthread & libthr: almost newbie question
- From: Ruslan Ermilov
- KSE, libpthread & libthr: almost newbie question
- Prev by Date: Re: KSE, libpthread & libthr: almost newbie question
- Next by Date: Re: KSE, libpthread & libthr: almost newbie question
- Previous by thread: Re: KSE, libpthread & libthr: almost newbie question
- Next by thread: Re: KSE, libpthread & libthr: almost newbie question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|