Re: Comments on the KSE option
- From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 19:02:54 -0500 (EST)
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, Scott Long wrote:
Btw, why is PTHREADS_INVARIANTS still enabled on -STABLE branches? We
don't have kernel INVARIANTS enabled there, so I don't understand why
libpthread needs to be different.
Because it doesn't hurt anything. I should just remove it
and always have it enabled so noone would complaint. I think
it also aids in telling us what happened when people mistakenly
mix different threading libraries (don't 'portupgrade -af').
--
DE
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Comments on the KSE option
- From: Julian Elischer
- Re: Comments on the KSE option
- From: David Xu
- Re: Comments on the KSE option
- From: Robert Watson
- Re: Comments on the KSE option
- From: Paul Allen
- Re: Comments on the KSE option
- From: Robert Watson
- Re: Comments on the KSE option
- From: Matthew Dillon
- Re: Comments on the KSE option
- From: Daniel Eischen
- Re: Comments on the KSE option
- From: Scott Long
- Re: Comments on the KSE option
- From: Daniel Eischen
- Re: Comments on the KSE option
- From: Scott Long
- Comments on the KSE option
- Prev by Date: Re: Call for Marvell/SysKonnect Yukon II Gigabit Ethernet testers.
- Next by Date: Re: Call for Marvell/SysKonnect Yukon II Gigabit Ethernet testers.
- Previous by thread: Re: Comments on the KSE option
- Next by thread: Re: Comments on the KSE option
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|