Re: shmget regression?
- From: Kris Kennaway <kris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 17:42:49 -0500
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 05:42:20PM +0100, JAroslav Suchanek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 01:45:21PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote:
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, JAroslav Suchanek wrote:
I've tried to post PR, but it seems it got lost somewhere.
I just wonder whether there was some change in shmget behavior in
current.
Look at this patch to src/sys-cur/tools/regression/sysvshm/shmtest.c
Can you send the output of 'ipcs' after the below code runs so that I can
see the mode it ended up being created with? You might try reverting the
priv(9) change to sysv_ipc.c and see if that fixes thanks?
Yop, the revert helped, I've used CVS revision 1.27.4.1 of the sysv_ipc.c.
Hmm, I've been having a lot of sysv ipc-related port errors on 7.x
system lately, but I hadn't investigated.
Kris
Attachment:
pgpFCsgY6aaXS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- shmget regression?
- From: JAroslav Suchanek
- Re: shmget regression?
- From: Robert Watson
- Re: shmget regression?
- From: JAroslav Suchanek
- shmget regression?
- Prev by Date: Re: EHCI problem on -current, and unknown devs
- Previous by thread: Re: shmget regression?
- Next by thread: some PR submissions are currently being lost
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|