Re: HEADS UP: compat6x
- From: Florent Thoumie <flz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 15:55:57 +0000
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Daniel Eischen <deischen@xxxxxxxxxxx> (from Tue, 5 Dec 2006
18:22:41 -0500 (EST)):
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, John Baldwin wrote:
Yes, but it doesn't hurt to just bump things now. I actually agree with
John's argument that it is beneficial to allow folks on current to
safely
use -stable apps by doing the library bump at first breakage.
Granted, after
7.0 that policy will be obsolete, but it is still relevant for
7-current. :)
Heck, why not just enable symbol versioning in current by default now
anyways?
I'm waiting until after the GCC import because that should
change the way dependencies are recorded in shared libraries,
which really would force everyone to rebuild everything all
over again. After the GCC import, we should bump all the
libraries and enable symbol versioning, and hopefully you'll
only have to rebuild things once.
We have several upcomming stuff which ideally should be coordinated
here. The symbol versioning (and the corresponding bump of the version
of some libs) results in the need to rebuild everything, and the import
of X.org 7.x would result in the need to rebuild some ports (when an
user wants to update). I don't know if the import of gcc4 will need a
rebuild of everything too.
While it might be a good idea to rebuild every X application after X.org
7.2 is merged, I don't think it's mandatory.
Could all involved people please speak with each other (or tell us you
did already) and try to coordinate a little bit?
If everything is alright, X.org 7.2 should hit the tree by Christmas.
Don't know if you need more information.
Cheers.
--
Florent Thoumie
flz@xxxxxxxxxxx
FreeBSD Committer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: HEADS UP: compat6x
- From: Matthew D. Fuller
- Re: HEADS UP: compat6x
- From: Alexander Leidinger
- Re: HEADS UP: compat6x
- References:
- Re: HEADS UP: compat6x
- From: Doug Barton
- Re: HEADS UP: compat6x
- From: Daniel Eischen
- Re: HEADS UP: compat6x
- From: John Baldwin
- Re: HEADS UP: compat6x
- From: Daniel Eischen
- Re: HEADS UP: compat6x
- From: Alexander Leidinger
- Re: HEADS UP: compat6x
- Prev by Date: Re: Updating a server with Vinum
- Next by Date: Re: Java problem on i386 7.0-CURRENT-200611 Again
- Previous by thread: Re: HEADS UP: compat6x
- Next by thread: Re: HEADS UP: compat6x
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|