Re: UFS_GJOURNAL and ufs.ko
- From: Yar Tikhiy <yar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 07:48:59 +0300
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 03:39:06PM +0000, Coleman Kane wrote:
Hello,
I have noticed (since adding UFS journal support) that the
UFS_GJOURNAL option hasn't been added to the ufs.ko kernel
module. I've been using this (out of an effort to test as
much as possible as KLDs) and every time I upgrade my kernel
I must manually add -DUFS_GJOURNAL to the CFLAGS line in
its Makefile.
Is there any specific reason why this can't be committed?
So far, my experience with GJOURNAL has been great testing
it both with journal+fs on the same device as well as on
two seperate devices.
It looks like an oversight to me, but I don't want to jump
the gun on it if there is some reasonable argument to keep
it out "by default".
If I understand you right, you run a custom kernel w/o UFS and load
the latter as a module, don't you? If so, just add "options
UFS_GJOURNAL" to your kernel config file, and the module should
pick up the setting from the kernel build directory then, granted
you build modules with the kernel, not with the world.
IMHO CFLAGS should go away from ufs.ko's Makefile because the module
should get SOFTUPDATES and UFS_DIRHASH from the kernel configuration,
too.
--
Yar
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: UFS_GJOURNAL and ufs.ko
- From: Coleman Kane
- Re: UFS_GJOURNAL and ufs.ko
- References:
- UFS_GJOURNAL and ufs.ko
- From: Coleman Kane
- UFS_GJOURNAL and ufs.ko
- Prev by Date: [head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386
- Next by Date: [head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64
- Previous by thread: Re: UFS_GJOURNAL and ufs.ko
- Next by thread: Re: UFS_GJOURNAL and ufs.ko
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
