Re: Can't link kernel after recent libalias commits?

On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 03:42:03AM +0100, Paolo Pisati wrote:
P> On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 11:04:33PM +0100, Max Laier wrote:
P> > On Saturday 30 December 2006 22:46, Paolo Pisati wrote:
P> > > On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 01:43:21PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
P> > > > Note that this was for a kernel that uses ipfw, but not natd (ref.
P> > > > src/sys/conf/NOTES).
P> > >
P> > > my mistake, i'll write an entry for UPDATING.
P> >
P> > Shouldn't it still be possible to build a kernel with IPFW but without
P> > LIBALIAS? i.e. instead of a UPDATING entry you should just wrap the
P> > libalias entry points in IPFW - or am I misunderstanding what you are
P> > saying?
P>
P> with my last commit, LIBALIAS became mandatory for IPFW, and this adds
P> 40kb (-O nocona) to my kernel size.
P>
P> If it's really an issue, i can change it.

As I said it will be very nice if it would be still possible to build
ipfw(4) w/o libalias. I think more people will share my opinion.

--
Totus tuus, Glebius.
GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"

Relevant Pages