Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems
- From: Coleman Kane <cokane@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 05:47:55 +0000
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 12:41:20AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote, and it was proclaimed:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:00:35PM -0700, Coleman Kane wrote:
What does the performance curve look like for the in-CVS 7-CURRENT tree with
4BSD or ULE ? How do those stand up against the Linux SMP scheduler for
scalability. It would be nice to see the comparison displayed to see what
the performance improvements of the aforementioned patch were realized to.
This would likely be a nice graphics for the SMPng project page, BTW...
There are graphs of this on Jeff's blog, referenced in that URL.
Fixing filedesc locking makes a HUGE difference.
Kris
Thanks. I saw that shortly after I sent the email... /me stupid.
How stable is ULE now since the recent swath of rewrites in the past months?
--
coleman
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems
- References:
- Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems
- From: Coleman Kane
- Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems
- Prev by Date: Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems
- Next by Date: correct way to pass callbacks
- Previous by thread: Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems
- Next by thread: Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems
- Index(es):