Re: libfetch ftp patch for less latency
- From: des@xxxxxx (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:30:26 +0200
Pieter de Goeje <pieter@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@xxxxxx> writes:
No. This is a violation of the FTP protocol.I'm reading rfc 959 right now, and it include examples of CWD with
full pathname (multiple directories). Actually the rfc is kinda
vague about this.
RFC959 does not require or guarantee that the path separator is /, nor
that "CD ../foo" does what you expect. There are also issues when the
initial CWD is not / (the document part in an FTP URL is relative to
the initial CWD, not absolute)
Libfetch used to do what Nate suggests, and it was changed to the
current behaviour because we encountered servers in the field with
which it didn't work.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@xxxxxx
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: libfetch ftp patch for less latency
- From: Peter Jeremy
- Re: libfetch ftp patch for less latency
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: libfetch ftp patch for less latency
- References:
- libfetch ftp patch for less latency
- From: Nate Lawson
- Re: libfetch ftp patch for less latency
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: libfetch ftp patch for less latency
- From: Pieter de Goeje
- libfetch ftp patch for less latency
- Prev by Date: Re: libfetch ftp patch for less latency
- Next by Date: Re: libfetch ftp patch for less latency
- Previous by thread: Re: libfetch ftp patch for less latency
- Next by thread: Re: libfetch ftp patch for less latency
- Index(es):