Re: libfetch ftp patch for less latency
- From: des@xxxxxx (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:43:45 +0200
Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
At first glance, the current behaviour does seem unnecessary and
Nate's patch seems an "obvious" improvement. Having a comment near
_ftp_cwd() explaining the current behaviour and why it isn't possible
to pass a pathname to CWD would have saved Nate some effort and
removed the need for this thread.
Sometimes, it is as important to document why an alternative algorithm
was not chosen as it is to document what the code is doing.
Isn't that why we have CVS logs?
----------------------------
revision 1.92
date: 2005/08/12 12:48:50; author: des; state: Exp; lines: +152 -29
Change directory one level at a time, and use CDUP to back out. This is a
work in progress; it partially fixed bin/83278 and is a prerequisite to
fixing bin/83277.
PR: bin/83277, bin/83278
----------------------------
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@xxxxxx
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- libfetch ftp patch for less latency
- From: Nate Lawson
- Re: libfetch ftp patch for less latency
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: libfetch ftp patch for less latency
- From: Pieter de Goeje
- Re: libfetch ftp patch for less latency
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: libfetch ftp patch for less latency
- From: Peter Jeremy
- libfetch ftp patch for less latency
- Prev by Date: ggated, gmirror + zfs panic
- Next by Date: Re: [PANIC] 7.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Mar 14 ...
- Previous by thread: Re: libfetch ftp patch for less latency
- Next by thread: Re: libfetch ftp patch for less latency
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
