Re: ATA FLUSHCACHE
- From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:42:23 +0930
On Tuesday 24 April 2007 18:14, Ollivier Robert wrote:
The main problem that I've found is that with a single disk
configuration, there is a timeout then the system recovers but with a
dual (or maybe more) disks involved, multiple/current timeouts make
the system panic and that is not nice.
I suspect that changing the timeout may just hide the real problem.
Hmm, it is a non fatal error for gjournal, I'm kind of surprised it's a
fatal one for ZFS..
If the cache flush really failed (eg due to a stuffed disk) then there
really is a problem, but IMO it is likely this is going to be caught by
a read or a write operation very soon.
If it is a transient error then panicing seems to be about the worse
response :)
--
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
-- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
Attachment:
pgprU4VbpGhqT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ATA FLUSHCACHE
- From: Ollivier Robert
- Re: ATA FLUSHCACHE
- From: Eric Anderson
- Re: ATA FLUSHCACHE
- References:
- Re: ATA FLUSHCACHE
- From: Daniel O'Connor
- Re: ATA FLUSHCACHE
- From: Ollivier Robert
- Re: ATA FLUSHCACHE
- Prev by Date: Re: Thinkpad T43 and projector problem
- Next by Date: Re: ATA FLUSHCACHE
- Previous by thread: Re: ATA FLUSHCACHE
- Next by thread: Re: ATA FLUSHCACHE
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|