Re: zfs: df and zpool list report different size
- From: "Joao Barros" <joao.barros@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:02:02 +0100
On 4/26/07, Ståle Kristoffersen <staalebk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2007-04-26 at 16:36, Ollivier Robert wrote:
> According to Alexandre Biancalana:
> > # zpool create backup raidz ad9 ad11
>
> Note, raidz with two disks is almost the same as a mirror so the real,
> usable space is half. In raidz, if you have N disks, the total usable
> capacity is N-1.
Well, that would have been fine if it did the same thing with a mirror, but
thats not the case:
# zpool create test raidz ad1 ad2 ad3
# zpool list
NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT
test 1.48G 773M 747M 50% ONLINE -
# df -ht zfs
Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
test 980M 32K 980M 0% /test
# zpool destroy test
# zpool create test mirror ad1 ad2
# zpool list
NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT
test 504M 88K 504M 0% ONLINE -
# df -ht zfs
Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
test 472M 32K 472M 0% /test
Try creating the raidz with 2 disks like Alexandre did...
--
Joao Barros
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- zfs: df and zpool list report different size
- From: Alexandre Biancalana
- Re: zfs: df and zpool list report different size
- From: Ollivier Robert
- Re: zfs: df and zpool list report different size
- From: Ståle Kristoffersen
- zfs: df and zpool list report different size
- Prev by Date: Re: Panic: fusefs crashes -current
- Next by Date: ASUS M2N on amd64. Devices not attached/known..
- Previous by thread: Re: zfs: df and zpool list report different size
- Next by thread: Re: zfs: df and zpool list report different size
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|