Re: strace causes panic: sleeping thread
- From: Stefan Ehmann <shoesoft@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:52:31 +0200
On Saturday 28 April 2007 13:55:03 Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 11:28:43AM +0200, Stefan Ehmann wrote:...
I see this on freshly build CURRENT (i386):
Using strace causes an immediate panic, e.g. strace echo foo:
This is because you do not have INVARIANTS in kernel. Then you would obtain
the "recursed on non-recursive mutex" panic.
The pfs_ioctl locks the process (pfs_ioctl()->pfs_visible()->pfind()) that
is the target of the ioctl, and then the pseudofs_ioctl() do PROC_LOCK()
again.
This is changed by rev. 1.62 of the fs/pseudofs/pseudofs_vnops.c, before it
process was held during pn_ioctl() call instead of being locked. Also, this
change seems to also take place for getextattr().
With the following patch, I was able to successfully strace ls. As a side
note, it seems that procfs ABI changed, strace built on RELENG_6 cannot run
on CURRENT.
Yes, INVARIANTS is disabled here.
The patch also works for me, thanks.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- strace causes panic: sleeping thread
- From: Stefan Ehmann
- Re: strace causes panic: sleeping thread
- From: Kostik Belousov
- strace causes panic: sleeping thread
- Prev by Date: Re: strace causes panic: sleeping thread
- Next by Date: Re: Panic: fusefs crashes -current
- Previous by thread: Re: strace causes panic: sleeping thread
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|