Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base.
- From: Darren Reed <darrenr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 08:55:32 +0000
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 10:01:17AM +0100, Vince wrote:
...
I may reinstall at a later date as this is still very much a box to play
with, but I gather there is no great gain from going 64 bit other than
not having to play with PAE if you've got lots or RAM.
It's not RAM that ZFS really likes but your KVA (Kernel Virtual Address)
space. With a 32bit kernel you are more likely to experience problems
with KVA shortage than you are RAM shortage when using ZFS.
Darren
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base.
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base.
- From: Ollivier Robert
- Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base.
- References:
- Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base.
- From: Vince
- Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base.
- From: Darren Reed
- Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base.
- From: Vince
- Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base.
- Prev by Date: etc/rc.d/{var,tmp} and sub-shell usage?!
- Next by Date: Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base.
- Previous by thread: Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base.
- Next by thread: Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|