bgfsck hosed (lockups) in -current?



I have current as of last week.

I noticed that if I needed a bgfsck on ufs when rebooting my system
would lock up almost immediately. Everything would deadlock.

If I rebooted single user and did a regular "fsck -y" then continued
to boot, I'd be OK.

Has anyone else experienced this? I'm going to update to the most
recent current and get more information (which wait channels etc)
but wanted to know if anyone knew about this.

I recall seeing a LOT of fixes for various deadlocks in snapshots
and bgfsck going in lately, but nothing that looked to me as if it'd
trigger a regression.

--
- Alfred Perlstein
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"



Relevant Pages

  • Re: bgfsck hosed (lockups) in -current?
    ... I noticed that if I needed a bgfsck on ufs when rebooting my system would ... Everything would deadlock. ... I recall seeing a LOT of fixes for various deadlocks in snapshots and ...
    (freebsd-current)
  • Re: bgfsck hosed (lockups) in -current?
    ... I noticed that if I needed a bgfsck on ufs when rebooting my system ... haven't had the subsequent bgfsck lock up on me yet. ...
    (freebsd-current)
  • Re: bgfsck hosed (lockups) in -current?
    ... I noticed that if I needed a bgfsck on ufs when rebooting my system would lock up almost immediately. ... Everything would deadlock. ... I recall seeing a LOT of fixes for various deadlocks in snapshots and bgfsck going in lately, but nothing that looked to me as if it'd trigger a regression. ...
    (freebsd-current)
  • Re: bgfsck hosed (lockups) in -current?
    ... On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Alfred Perlstein wrote: ... I noticed that if I needed a bgfsck on ufs when rebooting my system would ... I recall seeing a LOT of fixes for various deadlocks in snapshots and ...
    (freebsd-current)