Re: TERM={xterm-r5,xterm-r6} behaving badly with man(1)
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 11:21:19 +0200
Daniel Eischen <deischen@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
This is the *correct* behaviour. The termcap entry is supposed toWell, something did change recently to get this behavior.
reflect the capabilities of the terminal, not your personal preferences.
If you don't like it, you can override it using the TERMCAP environment
variable.
New libncurses perhaps? The termcap file itself hasn't changed since
late 2005.
And why do we have a termcap xterm entry that doesn't exhibit this
behavior?
Because somebody modified it to reflect his personal preference:
xterm|xterm-color|X11 terminal emulator:\
:ti@:te@:tc=xterm-xfree86:
the "ti@:te@:" part disables the save / restore functionality.
See for instance the log messages for src/share/termcap/termcap.src
revisions 1.129 and 1.130.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@xxxxxx
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: TERM={xterm-r5,xterm-r6} behaving badly with man(1)
- From: Rong-en Fan
- Re: TERM={xterm-r5,xterm-r6} behaving badly with man(1)
- References:
- TERM={xterm-r5,xterm-r6} behaving badly with man(1)
- From: Daniel Eischen
- Re: TERM={xterm-r5,xterm-r6} behaving badly with man(1)
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: TERM={xterm-r5,xterm-r6} behaving badly with man(1)
- From: Daniel Eischen
- TERM={xterm-r5,xterm-r6} behaving badly with man(1)
- Prev by Date: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sun4v
- Next by Date: [head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64
- Previous by thread: Re: TERM={xterm-r5,xterm-r6} behaving badly with man(1)
- Next by thread: Re: TERM={xterm-r5,xterm-r6} behaving badly with man(1)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|