Re: Encrypted zfs?
- From: Christian Walther <cptsalek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:01:17 +0000
Nathan Butcher wrote:
Yep, using GELI the providers is much better.
I decided to go one step further and run GLABEL on my drives so my ZFS
pool will be immune from device enumeration issues (assuming I move the
drives between systems, SATA raid cards, etc.)
[...]
AFAIK zfs is immune against device enumeration issues itself. There is a
nice video on YouTube showing Sun engineers setting up a ZFS pool on a
bunch of USB sticks. Afterwards they remove all of them, shuffle them,
and put them back in. No problem.
(It's in german and a translation is still missing. But the talk is
stupid anyway, and the acting of the engineers, too.)
This works on FreeBSD, too. I moved one of my disks to another
controller. ZFS recognised it on reboot.
Really nice. :-)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Encrypted zfs?
- From: Nathan Butcher
- Re: Encrypted zfs?
- From: Craig Boston
- Re: Encrypted zfs?
- From: Graham Todd
- Re: Encrypted zfs?
- References:
- Re: Encrypted zfs?
- From: Nathan Butcher
- Re: Encrypted zfs?
- Prev by Date: Re: Re: make release problems with sysutils/mkisofs and sysutils/cdrtools distfile
- Next by Date: Re: Recent changes in atapi-cam?
- Previous by thread: Re: Encrypted zfs?
- Next by thread: Re: Encrypted zfs?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|