Re: The safety expansion for FreeBSD rm(1)

Ivan Voras wrote:
Daichi GOTO wrote:
Hi Guys again

Today is not unionfs.

How is the unionfs patch progressing through re ? :) I hope it gets digested soon :)

I have sent a aprove request to re@ and been waiting for replay.
I have a hope to get aproval mail too :) I beleive in that recent
unionfs patches bunch is well viewed and working very good.

We have created safety expansion for rm(1). If you have any interests,
please try follow patch.

http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/safety-rm/

This looks useful, but shouldn't this feature be handled more globally, with a MAC policy or something like that?

Yes, that is not depending to MAC or other comprehensive access
framework. At the beginning, what's important is that I have anyone
needs that feature or not ;-) If someone needs that feature, I
will get the work of more comprehensive mechanism.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"