Re: pad argument for mmap/lseek/etc.
- From: John Baldwin <jhb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:14:22 -0400
On Monday 08 October 2007 01:25:45 pm Roman Divacky wrote:
The interesting question is whether the _SYS_SYSPROTO_H and absense of the
sys/sysproto.h supported. Or, shall we remove these #ifdef blocks instead
of fixing them in whole kernel.
I also support this idea... does anyone have an argument against or should I
just provide a patch (removing those definitions)
Many people (myself included) find it handy to have the uap structure
definition with the function.
--
John Baldwin
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: pad argument for mmap/lseek/etc.
- From: Matthew Dillon
- Re: pad argument for mmap/lseek/etc.
- References:
- pad argument for mmap/lseek/etc.
- From: Roman Divacky
- Re: pad argument for mmap/lseek/etc.
- From: Kostik Belousov
- Re: pad argument for mmap/lseek/etc.
- From: Roman Divacky
- pad argument for mmap/lseek/etc.
- Prev by Date: Re: uipc_sockbuf sysctl
- Next by Date: Re: panic on sparc64
- Previous by thread: Re: pad argument for mmap/lseek/etc.
- Next by thread: Re: pad argument for mmap/lseek/etc.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
