Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm
- From: Olivier <mlfbsd@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 18:35:20 +0100
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 04:13:57PM -0000, Bj?rn K?nig wrote:
[...]
cc -O2 -pipe -DINET6 -c /src/usr.bin/systat/main.c
cc -O2 -pipe -DINET6 -c /src/usr.bin/systat/mbufs.c
cc -O2 -pipe -DINET6 -c /src/usr.bin/systat/netcmds.c
/src/usr.bin/systat/netcmds.c: In function 'netcmd':
/src/usr.bin/systat/netcmds.c:127: internal compiler error: internal
consistency failure
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /src/usr.bin/systat.
*** Error code 1
[...]
Hello, I'm working on eliminating this bug. I encircled it already. It
comes with the commit of the following files on October 13th 2007 16:28
UTC:
src/include/_ctype.h
src/include/ctype.h
src/include/wctype.h
src/lib/libc/locale/Symbol.map
src/lib/libc/locale/big5.c
src/lib/libc/locale/euc.c
src/lib/libc/locale/gb18030.c
src/lib/libc/locale/gb2312.c
src/lib/libc/locale/gbk.c
src/lib/libc/locale/isctype.c
src/lib/libc/locale/iswctype.c
src/lib/libc/locale/mskanji.c
src/lib/libc/locale/none.c
src/lib/libc/locale/setrunelocale.c
src/lib/libc/locale/utf8.c
Maybe you're faster than me with solving this problem.
Regards
Bj?rn
Hi,
Thanks a lot for working on this !
As far as I know, nobody went that far.
I just switched to defaulting to -O, since this is only hitted with -O2, but
the tinderbox overrides the defaults.
Regards,
Olivier
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm
- From: Björn König
- Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm
- Prev by Date: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Wiki for discussing P35/IHC9(R)/SATA issues set up
- Next by Date: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Wiki for discussing P35/IHC9(R)/SATA issues set up
- Previous by thread: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm
- Next by thread: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|