Re: Serious compatibility breakage in -current.
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:07:43 +0100
"Carl Shapiro" <carl.shapiro@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
The switch from SIGBUS to SIGSEGV is well motivated.
Is it? I see no mention of it in the commit log for the revision that
actually implemented the change. David argued on -CURRENT that it is
more POSIXly correct, provided that he interpreted POSIX correctly; how
do other operating systems behave in this case?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@xxxxxx
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Serious compatibility breakage in -current.
- From: Bakul Shah
- Re: Serious compatibility breakage in -current.
- From: Kris Kennaway
- Re: Serious compatibility breakage in -current.
- References:
- Serious compatibility breakage in -current.
- From: Carl Shapiro
- Serious compatibility breakage in -current.
- Prev by Date: Re: 7-BETA3 everyday reboot (was: BETA3 crash)
- Next by Date: Re: -CURRENT buildkernel failure
- Previous by thread: Re: Serious compatibility breakage in -current.
- Next by thread: Re: Serious compatibility breakage in -current.
- Index(es):