Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- From: "Ivan Voras" <ivoras@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 15:57:53 +0100
On 16/12/2007, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@xxxxxx> wrote:
Ivan Voras <ivoras@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
These are all "normal" CompactFlash cards, for which the widely
available size seems to be 16 GB max, right?
So? That's more than enough for a ZFS intent log (as a rule of thumb,
the ZIL should be half the size of the server's RAM).
Why do you consider ZIL to be a good candidate for putting on a SSD?
Isn't it sequential-access mostly?
Did you (or anyone) deploy CF drives for production servers?
My router (and DNS, NTP and DHCP server) is a net4801 with a 1 GB CF
chip.
Ok, these are probably embedded appliances that don't get much storage
traffic. I was thinking about different kind of servers - database,
web or file servers.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- References:
- ZFS melting under postgres...
- From: Peter Losher
- Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- From: David Duchscher
- Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- From: David Duchscher
- Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- From: Ivan Voras
- Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- From: Maxim Sobolev
- Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- From: Ivan Voras
- Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- From: Ivan Voras
- Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- ZFS melting under postgres...
- Prev by Date: [head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98
- Next by Date: Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- Previous by thread: Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- Next by thread: Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- Index(es):