Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 15:51:35 +0100
Ivan Voras <ivoras@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
These are all "normal" CompactFlash cards, for which the widely
available size seems to be 16 GB max, right?
So? That's more than enough for a ZFS intent log (as a rule of thumb,
the ZIL should be half the size of the server's RAM).
Did you (or anyone) deploy CF drives for production servers?
My router (and DNS, NTP and DHCP server) is a net4801 with a 1 GB CF
chip.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@xxxxxx
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- From: matt
- Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- From: Ivan Voras
- Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- References:
- ZFS melting under postgres...
- From: Peter Losher
- Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- From: Benjamin Close
- Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- From: Hugo Silva
- Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- From: Benjamin Close
- Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- From: David Duchscher
- Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- From: David Duchscher
- Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- From: Ivan Voras
- Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- From: Maxim Sobolev
- Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- From: Ivan Voras
- Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- From: Ivan Voras
- ZFS melting under postgres...
- Prev by Date: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm
- Next by Date: Re: Valgrind GCC 4.2 patches
- Previous by thread: Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- Next by thread: Re: ZFS melting under postgres...
- Index(es):