Re: Turning COMPAT_43TTY into a binary-only compatibility
- From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:42:30 +0100
Ed Schouten wrote:
Is there someone who wants to help me here?
I'm too busy to review or help what you'r up to, sorry, but if your
changes are the way FreeBSD is going, I have hardware that uses these:
/usr/ports/comms/gnokii MAINTAINER=mad@xxxxxxxxxxxx
/usr/ports/misc/estic Port by me, MAINTAINER=dinoex@xxxxxxxxxxx
/usr/ports/sysutils/nut MAINTAINER=Joerg.Pulz@xxxxxxxxxxx
& if necessary ? I'll be able to test diffs occasionaly when necessary.
(Hosts here run releasess & stable, but I could put up current when needed).
Loads of people presumably similarly rely on serial port coms to
various obscure Non PC hardware, Sometimes ports MAINTAINER= wont
have hardware to test with (eg in case of misc/estic I think).
Perhaps ports Makefiles might benefit from another variable with
email of hardware tester[s] ? (thus cc'd suggestion to
portsmaster@xxxxxxxxxxx)
--
Julian Stacey. Munich Computer Consultant, BSD Unix C Linux. http://berklix.com
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Turning COMPAT_43TTY into a binary-only compatibility
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: Turning COMPAT_43TTY into a binary-only compatibility
- References:
- Turning COMPAT_43TTY into a binary-only compatibility
- From: Ed Schouten
- Turning COMPAT_43TTY into a binary-only compatibility
- Prev by Date: fwd: [linimon@lonesome.com: results of the 20080125 bugathon]
- Next by Date: Re: IPSEC on 7.0-PRERELEASE
- Previous by thread: Turning COMPAT_43TTY into a binary-only compatibility
- Next by thread: Re: Turning COMPAT_43TTY into a binary-only compatibility
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
