Re: Http Accept filters (accf_http)
- From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:32:26 +0000
In message <480E589C.8010108@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Xin LI writes:
| Does anyone know why accf_accept is disabled by default in the ports'
| stock Apache 2.2 (it's disabled in the default config files)? I thought
| it was because it was dangerous or flawed for some reason, though (at
| least for light loads comparable to those of OP) it seems to work fine.
I think adding them to the apache is OK, as long as apache fails
gracefully if they are not present in the kernel.
Yes, I wonder that too. Personally I think it might be a good idea to
just bind accf_http and accf_data into GENERIC, as I always add them
into kernel configuration at my company... My $0.02
No, GENERIC should not be bloated when it can be effortlessly loaded
as a KLD.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@xxxxxxxxxxx | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Http Accept filters (accf_http)
- From: Antony Mawer
- Re: Http Accept filters (accf_http)
- References:
- Re: Http Accept filters (accf_http)
- From: Xin LI
- Re: Http Accept filters (accf_http)
- Prev by Date: Re: Http Accept filters (accf_http)
- Next by Date: Re: Http Accept filters (accf_http)
- Previous by thread: Re: Http Accept filters (accf_http)
- Next by thread: Re: Http Accept filters (accf_http)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|