Re: Call for Testers: Convert watchdog spinlock into a sleepable mutex in if_ndis

Works fine for me. No regressions encountered yet.

On 6/10/08, Coleman Kane <cokane@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 14:56 +0200, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
On 6/10/08, Coleman Kane <cokane@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 05:16 +0200, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
On 6/9/08, Coleman Kane <cokane@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ignore the previous patch (#2) and try this one instead:
*
http://people.freebsd.org/~cokane/patches/if_ndis-spinlock-to-mtx3.patch


Fine for me, LOR appear any more.

Thanks for the report.


BTW: I'm dont like first line showing over and over again. It would be
nice
if that clueless message goes away.

Is this a new message introduced with my changes?
No, it is not. Thanks for patch(es).


I've got one more for you to try:
*
http://people.freebsd.org/~cokane/patches/if_ndis-spinlock-to-mtx4.patch

It removes the locking inside the ndis_tick function altogether, and
just relies upon ndis_ticktask, ndis_resettask, and ndis_starttask to
perform the appropriate locking (which they appear to have been written
to do already). This might improve concurrency even more (and probably
get rid of some mutex recursions).

--
Coleman Kane

_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"