Re: RFC: ATA to CAM integration patch
- From: Kamigishi Rei <spambox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:25:16 +0400
Alexander Motin wrote:
Sorry, my fault, it is the different bug, due to disabled invariants I have missed two locking issues. Here is regenerated patch, including this fix and all previous fixes and improvements:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/cam-ata.20090629.patch
OK, a question about the module: sometimes I'm getting loads (20+) of messages like
ahcich1: ALL SLOTS BUSY!
Is it purely informational or does it indicate a problem? (I'm using Intel Q35+ICH9 in AHCI mode.)
Also, experienced a fatal trap 12 (page fault while in kernel mode) once after the patch but couldn't get a reliable dump (though I doubt the problem is in ahci.ko - looks like another problem in tcp stack, yet again).
P.S. Could you please change "Native Command Queueing Enabled" to "Native Command Queueing enabled" ;) just for better looks, as many of FreeBSD's kernel messages lack proper capitalization and such. Thanks ;)
--
Kamigishi Rei
KREI-RIPE
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: ATA to CAM integration patch
- From: Lucius Windschuh
- Re: RFC: ATA to CAM integration patch
- From: Alexander Motin
- Re: RFC: ATA to CAM integration patch
- References:
- Re: RFC: ATA to CAM integration patch
- From: Alexander Motin
- Re: RFC: ATA to CAM integration patch
- From: Kamigishi Rei
- Re: RFC: ATA to CAM integration patch
- From: Alexander Motin
- Re: RFC: ATA to CAM integration patch
- Prev by Date: Re: RFC: ATA to CAM integration patch
- Next by Date: Re: RFC: ATA to CAM integration patch
- Previous by thread: Re: RFC: ATA to CAM integration patch
- Next by thread: Re: RFC: ATA to CAM integration patch
- Index(es):