Re: gpart and sector size
- From: Dimitry Andric <dimitry@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 22:44:34 +0200
On 2010-04-08 21:34, Alexey Tarasov wrote:
Thank you for the information.
In 8-STABLE snapshot 201002 diskinfo shows 512k sector size yet.
I will try CURRENT tomorrow.
It looks like the code was MFC'd to stable/8 in r199443. However, even
in -CURRENT, the sector size you see in diskinfo will also be 512B.
For ada(4) disks, it seems the d_sectorsize field of geom_disk's struct
disk is initialized using the _logical_ sector size, not the physical
sector size (which may be a multiple of the logical sector size).
That said, if the physical sector size is larger than the logical
sector size, the d_stripesize field is initialized with it. So if you
run "diskinfo -v" on the disk, what is the output for stripesize?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: gpart and sector size
- From: Alexey Tarasov
- Re: gpart and sector size
- References:
- gpart and sector size
- From: Alexey Tarasov
- Re: gpart and sector size
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: gpart and sector size
- From: Alexey Tarasov
- Re: gpart and sector size
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: gpart and sector size
- From: Alexey Tarasov
- Re: gpart and sector size
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: gpart and sector size
- From: Alexey Tarasov
- Re: gpart and sector size
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: gpart and sector size
- From: Alexey Tarasov
- Re: gpart and sector size
- From: Gary Jennejohn
- Re: gpart and sector size
- From: Dimitry Andric
- Re: gpart and sector size
- From: Alexey Tarasov
- gpart and sector size
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] Rewriting sade(8)
- Next by Date: Re: When will we can use ZFS v24?
- Previous by thread: Re: gpart and sector size
- Next by thread: Re: gpart and sector size
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|