Re: utmpx
- From: Renato Botelho <rbgarga@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:49:20 -0200
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Ed Schouten <ed@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
* Anonymous <swell.k@xxxxxxxxx>, 20101105 12:58:
There are more, see ports listed under utmpx.h in
http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsBrokenOnCurrent
It should be noted that that list is a bit pessimistic, since various
ports have been fixed in the mean time.
Ed,
I've made a patch for chkrootkit [1], it's building, but i didn't test if
it's working. Could you take a look at it?
[1] http://people.freebsd.org/~garga/patches/chkrootkit-utmpx.diff
Regards
--
Renato Botelho
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: utmpx
- From: Ed Schouten
- Re: utmpx
- References:
- 9-CURRENT: ports/net/kdenetwork3 does not compile
- From: Matthias Apitz
- Re: 9-CURRENT: ports/net/kdenetwork3 does not compile
- From: Ed Schouten
- utmpx (was: Re: 9-CURRENT: ports/net/kdenetwork3 does not compile)
- From: Matthias Apitz
- Re: utmpx
- From: Anonymous
- Re: utmpx
- From: Ed Schouten
- 9-CURRENT: ports/net/kdenetwork3 does not compile
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] Outline of USB process integration in the kernel taskqueue system
- Next by Date: stuck in cam with bad optical media
- Previous by thread: Re: utmpx
- Next by thread: Re: utmpx
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
