Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
- From: Chris Rees <utisoft@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 18:27:35 +0000
On 9 January 2012 18:16, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Mark Linimon <linimon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
FWIW, this was more a sarcastic sentence pointing out that FreeBSD isOn 9. Jan 2012, at 01:04 , Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
So you are saying that FreeBSD is currently providing on
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub images tagged as being "9.0 RELEASE" (with
checksum provided), in a `releases' directory, which are not actually
release images per-se ?
Excellent! You've shown the ability to understand flat, declarative,
sentences that have no qualifying phrases.
currently officially distributing non-released build in a directory
which might leads users to consider this is the official release, thus
misleading them.
So, a pointless email.
9.0 will be *released* when and only when the official, signed, emailok, I'm a stupid lazy user (obviously)... While browsing the ftp, I
goes out. Everything up until that point is preparation.
see 9.0 ISOs in a `releases' directory. Do you expect me to consult
freebsd-announce@, verify the signature of the announce, the hash of
the ISOs, etc. to consider that 9.0 has been released ? No, I see 9.0
ISOs in a `releases' directory, I assume it has been released,
whatever your spreading process is.
Btw, none of the CHECKSUMS files are signed on the FTP.
Have you checked the website? The latest supported release is clearly
specified, right in the middle of the home page.
Please don't tell me you'd look in ftp before checking the website. I
think you're just looking to nitpick.
Chris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
- From: Arnaud Lacombe
- Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
- From: Freddie Cash
- Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
- References:
- Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
- From: Arnaud Lacombe
- Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
- From: Mark Linimon
- Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
- From: Arnaud Lacombe
- Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
- Prev by Date: Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
- Next by Date: Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
- Previous by thread: Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
- Next by thread: Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|