Re: ufs multilabel performance (fwd)
- From: Edward Tomasz Napierała <trasz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 22:57:09 +0200
Wiadomość napisana przez Adrian Chadd w dniu 17 kwi 2012, o godz. 21:17:
On 16 April 2012 23:31, Richard Kojedzinszky <krichy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So now reactions here, creating files with multilabel is still slow.
I would like to use multilabel access control on my /tmp, for example, my
web server places it's session files there in a subdirectory. Of course, I
would like to assign a label for that subdir, but with this slow file
creation, that is not the way to go. I may then use a different filesystem
for that. In this case, can I assign a root mac label for a mount point?
Hi,
This is a perfect job for hwpmc / dtrace.
Would you be able to load up either of those and get some CPU usage
statistics whilst you're running your benchmark?
It's either that, or it's (massive) locking contention.
Or disk I/O. MAC labels, just like ACLs, are stored in extended attributes,
and I remember something about writing those being synchronous.
--
If you cut off my head, what would I say? Me and my head, or me and my body?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ufs multilabel performance (fwd)
- From: Richard Kojedzinszky
- Re: ufs multilabel performance (fwd)
- References:
- Re: ufs multilabel performance (fwd)
- From: O. Hartmann
- Re: ufs multilabel performance (fwd)
- From: Garrett Cooper
- Re: ufs multilabel performance (fwd)
- From: O. Hartmann
- Re: ufs multilabel performance (fwd)
- From: Garrett Cooper
- Re: ufs multilabel performance (fwd)
- From: Richard Kojedzinszky
- Re: ufs multilabel performance (fwd)
- From: Adrian Chadd
- Re: ufs multilabel performance (fwd)
- Prev by Date: Re: "/sys/conf/kmod.mk", line 111: Malformed conditional (${MK_CLANG_IS_CC}
- Next by Date: [head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386
- Previous by thread: Re: ufs multilabel performance (fwd)
- Next by thread: Re: ufs multilabel performance (fwd)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|