about netmap num_rx_desc.
- From: "root@xxxxxxx" <root@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 19:14:28 +0800
in netmap_kern.h
struct netmap_adapter {
......
u_int num_rx_desc;
//u_int buff_size; // XXX deprecate, use NETMAP_BUF_SIZE
but in netmap.c
int
netmap_attach(struct netmap_adapter *na, int num_queues)
{
....
na->num_rx_rings = num_queues;
ixgbe_netmap.h
static void
ixgbe_netmap_attach(struct adapter *adapter)
{
...
netmap_attach(&na, adapter->num_queues);
}
why not use the netmap_buf_size as na->num_rx_rings;
then will be have a larger buffer_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Prev by Date: Re: (void)foo or __unused foo ?
- Next by Date: Re: (void)foo or __unused foo ?
- Previous by thread: (void)foo or __unused foo ?
- Next by thread: r238860: bsdtar: eating up 100% CPU, hanging
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
