jail && (ping && traceroute)
From: Alexandr Kovalenko (never_at_nevermind.kiev.ua)
Date: 05/30/03
- Previous message: Scott Mitchell: "Re: RBEM10/100+56k at 32-bit cardBus"
- Next in thread: Nielsen: "Re: jail && (ping && traceroute)"
- Reply: Nielsen: "Re: jail && (ping && traceroute)"
- Reply: Mooneer Salem: "RE: jail && (ping && traceroute)"
- Reply: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: jail && (ping && traceroute)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 17:35:42 +0300 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
[Please Cc: me on reply]
Hello,
I have 2 questions:
- where in code should I search for icmp socket binding prohibition in
jail?;
- what bad consequences will appear if I remove those checks and
prohibition?.
Thanks in advance!
-- NEVE-RIPE, will build world for food Ukrainian FreeBSD User Group http://uafug.org.ua/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Scott Mitchell: "Re: RBEM10/100+56k at 32-bit cardBus"
- Next in thread: Nielsen: "Re: jail && (ping && traceroute)"
- Reply: Nielsen: "Re: jail && (ping && traceroute)"
- Reply: Mooneer Salem: "RE: jail && (ping && traceroute)"
- Reply: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: jail && (ping && traceroute)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]