Re: jail && (ping && traceroute)
From: Nielsen (nielsen_at_memberwebs.com)
Date: 05/30/03
- Previous message: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: libc_r: threaded application could stuck in accept(2)"
- In reply to: Alexandr Kovalenko: "jail && (ping && traceroute)"
- Next in thread: Mooneer Salem: "RE: jail && (ping && traceroute)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Alexandr Kovalenko" <never@nevermind.kiev.ua>, <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
This has been discussed at length. Search the archives of this mailing
list (or maybe it was freebsd-security) for interesting insight. Sure
set me straight as to the consequences
Nate
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alexandr Kovalenko" <never@nevermind.kiev.ua>
To: <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 8:35
Subject: jail && (ping && traceroute)
> [Please Cc: me on reply]
>
> Hello,
>
> I have 2 questions:
>
> - where in code should I search for icmp socket binding prohibition
in
> jail?;
> - what bad consequences will appear if I remove those checks and
> prohibition?.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> --
> NEVE-RIPE, will build world for food
> Ukrainian FreeBSD User Group
> http://uafug.org.ua/
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: libc_r: threaded application could stuck in accept(2)"
- In reply to: Alexandr Kovalenko: "jail && (ping && traceroute)"
- Next in thread: Mooneer Salem: "RE: jail && (ping && traceroute)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
