Re: are /etc/ld.so.conf and ld-elf.so.conf still used by ldconfig(8) ?
From: Alexey Neyman (alex.neyman_at_auriga.ru)
Date: 06/27/03
- Previous message: Marco Molteni: "are /etc/ld.so.conf and ld-elf.so.conf still used by ldconfig(8) ?"
- In reply to: Marco Molteni: "are /etc/ld.so.conf and ld-elf.so.conf still used by ldconfig(8) ?"
- Next in thread: Igor Pokrovsky: "Re: are /etc/ld.so.conf and ld-elf.so.conf still used by ldconfig(8) ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Marco Molteni <molter@tin.it> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 18:19:21 +0400
hi, there!
On Friday 27 June 2003 17:59, Marco Molteni wrote:
MM> On -current, according to the ldconfig man page:
[ .. skipped .. ]
MM> If I am correct, could somebody fix the man page? It is misleading.
PR: conf/25527, resting there for more than 2 years...
Regards,
Alexey.
-- A quoi ca sert d'etre sur la terre Si c'est pour faire nos vies a genoux? _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Marco Molteni: "are /etc/ld.so.conf and ld-elf.so.conf still used by ldconfig(8) ?"
- In reply to: Marco Molteni: "are /etc/ld.so.conf and ld-elf.so.conf still used by ldconfig(8) ?"
- Next in thread: Igor Pokrovsky: "Re: are /etc/ld.so.conf and ld-elf.so.conf still used by ldconfig(8) ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]